A Concrete Example

[Douglas Laycock]

Sometimes they are about whether you worship where you like.  And sometimes, they are about whether you worship at all.  In the first set of cases, there is less incentive for the church to sue and a stronger basis for the court to find no substantial burden.  There are a substantial number of cases in each category, but strong reason to believe that the successful cases are disproportionately about whether you worship at all.   

Quoting hamilton02 at aol.com:

> It is not a right because you say it is. The doctrine does not 
> support your claims as to rights.   Besides these cases are not about 
> whether you worship. They are about whether you worship wherever you 
> like.   Lamf frequently where you like us where you got the best 
> price regardless of zoning
> Marci
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rick Duncan <nebraskalawprof at yahoo.com>
>
> Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:42:07
> To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics<religionlaw at lists.ucla.edu>
> Subject: Re: A Concrete Example
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To post, send message to Religionlaw at lists.ucla.edu
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw[1]
>
> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as 
> private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are 
> posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can 
> (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
>
> _______________________________________________
> To post, send message to Religionlaw at lists.ucla.edu
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw[2]
>
> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as 
> private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are 
> posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can 
> (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
>
>
>

Douglas Laycock
Yale Kamisar Collegiate Professor of Law
University of Michigan Law School
625 S. State St.
Ann Arbor, MI  48109-1215
  734-647-9713

Links:
------
[1] http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
[2] http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/religionlaw/attachments/20090626/aef84c4c/attachment.htm>