still waiting for concrete examples

Vance R. Koven vrkoven at gmail.com
Mon Jun 22 17:37:11 PDT 2009


To say nothing of a race discrimination case, since this condition
apparently primarily affects African Americans.
Is this where the phrase "too clever by half" comes in?

Vance

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Steven Jamar <stevenjamar at gmail.com> wrote:

> well, out of rfra and into ada?  since it is a medical necessity not to
> shave, the state runs into ada.  it would seem that a closely cropped beard
> would meet the medical need as opposed to a long beard which could be a
> bigger problem.
> steve
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:24 PM, <ArtSpitzer at aol.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> It would have been very hard to prove the Department's bad motivation.
>> The Fire Department would have argued that our case made it reexamine the
>> facial hair issue, and it concluded that safety required everyone to be
>> clean-shaven.  (That's essentially what it did say.)
>> And I'm not so sure that issuing a religion-neutral regulation because
>> your lawyer advises you that if you continue to make medical exceptions
>> you'll also have to make religious exceptions makes the regulation
>> non-neutral.  It's not as if there was no support for the Department's
>> safety argument.  There was support.
>>
>> Art Spitzer
>>
>>
>> **************
>> An Excellent Credit Score is 750. See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps! (
>> http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1221823273x1201398689/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=62&bcd=JuneExcfooterNO62)
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> To post, send message to Religionlaw at lists.ucla.edu
>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
>> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
>>
>> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
>> private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
>> posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
>> wrongly) forward the messages to others.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Prof. Steven Jamar
> Howard University School of Law
> Associate Director, Institute of Intellectual Property and Social Justice
> (IIPSJ) Inc.
>
> _______________________________________________
> To post, send message to Religionlaw at lists.ucla.edu
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
>
> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
> private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
> posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
> wrongly) forward the messages to others.
>



-- 
Vance R. Koven
Boston, MA USA
vrkoven at world.std.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/religionlaw/attachments/20090622/33775ca7/attachment.htm>


More information about the Religionlaw mailing list