still waiting for concrete examples
Steven Jamar
stevenjamar at gmail.com
Mon Jun 22 17:29:46 PDT 2009
well, out of rfra and into ada? since it is a medical necessity not to
shave, the state runs into ada. it would seem that a closely cropped beard
would meet the medical need as opposed to a long beard which could be a
bigger problem.
steve
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:24 PM, <ArtSpitzer at aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> It would have been very hard to prove the Department's bad motivation. The
> Fire Department would have argued that our case made it reexamine the facial
> hair issue, and it concluded that safety required everyone to be
> clean-shaven. (That's essentially what it did say.)
> And I'm not so sure that issuing a religion-neutral regulation because your
> lawyer advises you that if you continue to make medical exceptions you'll
> also have to make religious exceptions makes the regulation non-neutral.
> It's not as if there was no support for the Department's safety argument.
> There was support.
>
> Art Spitzer
>
>
> **************
> An Excellent Credit Score is 750. See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps! (
> http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1221823273x1201398689/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=62&bcd=JuneExcfooterNO62)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To post, send message to Religionlaw at lists.ucla.edu
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
>
> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
> private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
> posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
> wrongly) forward the messages to others.
>
--
Prof. Steven Jamar
Howard University School of Law
Associate Director, Institute of Intellectual Property and Social Justice
(IIPSJ) Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/religionlaw/attachments/20090622/352a086a/attachment.htm>
More information about the Religionlaw
mailing list