Americans United: Iowa Supreme Court Ruling On MarriageUpholdsReligious Liberty, Says Americans United

[Brad Pardee]

You're talking about different religions, though, Steve.  The standard model 
that we see in the debate over gay rights is to compare it to the civil 
rights movement in the 60s.  People who don't support gay marriage are 
characterized as being no different than people who didn't support 
interracial marriage.  Do you think it is a stretch to say that there are 
those who would support saying a church can't refuse to perform marriages of 
African-Americans?  Using the way the debate is waged as a measuring stick, 
it seems safe to say that it's only a matter of time before there will be 
those who also support saying a church can't refuse to perform commitment 
ceremonies of homosexuals.

And "fear-mongering"?  I can accept that we disagree on the possibility of 
this line of argument coming to fruition.  I fully believe that your views 
are based on an honest assessment of what you believe to be true.  But I 
don't think I've EVER heard the term fear-mongering used where it wasn't 
inferring some manner of dishonest manipulation, propagandizing, and 
pandering.  Is that a fair assumption to make about what I wrote?  I might 
be wrong.  I hope I'm wrong.  But I'm honestly speaking what I believe to be 
true.  Disagree with me if you believe I'm wrong.  I wouldn't want you to 
pretend to agree if you don't.  But it's not fear-mongering just because we 
disagree on whether there is something to legitimately be afraid of.

Brad

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steven Jamar" <stevenjamar at gmail.com>
To: "Law & Religion issues for Law Academics" <religionlaw at lists.ucla.edu>
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 8:05 PM
Subject: Re: Americans United: Iowa Supreme Court Ruling On 
MarriageUpholdsReligious Liberty, Says Americans United

> It is quite a stretch to say someone must not discriminate in renting 
> property or providing secular services to say that religious 
> organizations and their officiants must perform an action like  marrying 
> two other people contrary to their beliefs.  We don't force  priests to 
> marry a catholic to a jew or an orthodox rabbi to perform  the ceremony 
> between an athiest and a orthodox jew, even when the  people are of 
> different sexes.
>
> Brad is overstating the danger in the typical fear-mongering of those 
> opposing gay marriage.