Mark of the beast lawsuit by Amish

[David E. Guinn]

The "mark of the beast" is drawn from Revelations 13:16-18 and refers to Satan's mark (666).  





David E. Guinn, JD, PhD 


Recent Publications Available from SSRN at


http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=199608





From: jean.dudley at gmail.com
Subject: Re: Mark of the beast lawsuit by Amish
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:23:10 -0800
To: religionlaw at lists.ucla.edu


Getting my grammatical pedant on:  Shouldn't that be "mark in (or on) the beast"? 
As for references to Smith and Twombly, I'm in the utter dark.  I'm just a photographer, after all. 
On Nov 14, 2008, at Fri, Nov 14,  11:10 AM, Marc Stern wrote: Plainly the use of id's on cattle is a mark of the beast. I am  puzzled by Professor Masinter's s reference to Twombly-i don't see the relevance of the reference. Marc Stern
   From: religionlaw-bounces at lists.ucla.edu [mailto:religionlaw-bounces at lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Marty Lederman
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 2:03 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: Mark of the beast lawsuit by Amish

 Complaint:

http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/files/satanfiling.pdf

DOJ Brief:

http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/files/beast.pdf




 On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Jean Dudley <jean.dudley at gmail.com> wrote:
 http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/11/bush-administra.html

 From   the Wired article:  "The Amish farmers claim    Michigan
regulations requiring them to use radio frequency   identification
devices on their cattle "constitutes some form of a 'mark of   the
beast' and/or represents an infringement of their 'dominion   over
cattle and all living things' in violation of their   fundamental
religious beliefs," according to the farmers' lawsuit filed   in
September in U.S. District Court for the District of   Columbia."

Thoughts?

Jean
_______________________________________________
To   post, send message to Religionlaw at lists.ucla.edu
To   subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please   note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.    Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted;   people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly)   forward the messages to others.

_______________________________________________To post, send message to Religionlaw at lists.ucla.eduTo subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others. 

_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live Hotmail now works up to 70% faster.
http://windowslive.com/Explore/Hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_faster_112008
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/religionlaw/attachments/20081114/d1c210da/attachment.htm