Mark of the beast lawsuit by Amish

[Marc Stern]

Plainly the use of id's on cattle is a mark of the beast.
I am  puzzled by Professor Masinter's s reference to Twombly-i don't see
the relevance of the reference.
Marc Stern

________________________________

From: religionlaw-bounces at lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-bounces at lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Marty Lederman
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 2:03 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: Mark of the beast lawsuit by Amish


Complaint:

http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/files/satanfiling.pdf

DOJ Brief:

http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/files/beast.pdf





On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Jean Dudley <jean.dudley at gmail.com>
wrote:


	http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/11/bush-administra.html
	
	 From the Wired article:  "The Amish farmers claim  Michigan
	regulations requiring them to use radio frequency identification
	devices on their cattle "constitutes some form of a 'mark of the
	beast' and/or represents an infringement of their 'dominion over
	cattle and all living things' in violation of their fundamental
	religious beliefs," according to the farmers' lawsuit filed in
	September in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia."
	
	Thoughts?
	
	Jean
	_______________________________________________
	To post, send message to Religionlaw at lists.ucla.edu
	To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
	
	Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be
viewed as private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages
that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can
(rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
	


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/religionlaw/attachments/20081114/600e22d2/attachment.htm