Mark of the beast lawsuit by Amish
Douglas Laycock
laycockd at umich.edu
Fri Nov 14 10:09:59 PST 2008
It isn't clear from the story whether this is something Michigan did wholly on its own, or whether it is a condition of some federal grant although not formally mandated. If it's a conditional spending program, I would treat the feds as responsible.
Michigan appears to have interpreted its own free exercise clause to mean something like Sherbert-Yoder instead of Smith, although the cases are far from perfectly clear.
Quoting "Michael R. Masinter" <masinter at nova.edu>:
> In the post Smith world, it's not obvious why the free exercise clause
> would forbid Michigan from requiring the use of RFID chips even if
> members of a particular faith think the chips constitute the mark of
> the beast. In the post Bell Atlantic v. Twombly world, the argument
> that RFRA applies because Michigan is acting as a puppet of USDA even
> though USDA regs explicitly make participation in any federal
> identification program optional seems at first glance to be a stretch.
>
> Michael R. Masinter 3305 College Avenue
> Professor of Law Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314
> Nova Southeastern University 954.262.6151 (voice)
> masinter at nova.edu 954.262.3835 (fax)
>
> Visiting Professor of Law (2008-2009) 305.284.3626 (voice)
> University of Miami Law School mmasinter at law.miami.edu
> 1311 Miller Drive
> Coral Gables, FL 33146
>
>
> Quoting Jean Dudley <jean.dudley at gmail.com>:
>
>> http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/11/bush-administra.html[1]
>>
>> From the Wired article: "The Amish farmers claim Michigan
>> regulations requiring them to use radio frequency identification
>> devices on their cattle "constitutes some form of a 'mark of the
>> beast' and/or represents an infringement of their 'dominion over
>> cattle and all living things' in violation of their fundamental
>> religious beliefs," according to the farmers' lawsuit filed in
>> September in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia."
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Jean
>> _______________________________________________
>> To post, send message to Religionlaw at lists.ucla.edu
>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
>> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw[2]
>>
>> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed
>> as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that
>> are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can
>> (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
>>
>
>
>
> Michael R. Masinter 3305 College Avenue
> Professor of Law Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314
> Nova Southeastern University 954.262.6151 (voice)
> masinter at nova.edu 954.262.3835 (fax)
>
> Visiting Professor of Law (2008-2009) 305.284.3626 (voice)
> University of Miami Law School mmasinter at law.miami.edu
> 1311 Miller Drive
> Coral Gables, FL 33146
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To post, send message to Religionlaw at lists.ucla.edu
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw[3]
>
> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
> private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
> posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can
> (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
>
>
>
Douglas Laycock
Yale Kamisar Collegiate Professor of Law
University of Michigan Law School
625 S. State St.
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
734-647-9713
Links:
------
[1] http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/11/bush-administra.html
[2] http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
[3] http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/religionlaw/attachments/20081114/40959f03/attachment.htm
More information about the Religionlaw
mailing list