Cert Grant in Summum

[Christopher Lund]

The dissents (there are a couple) are all at 499 F.3d 1070...
 
Christopher C. Lund
Assistant Professor of Law
Mississippi College School of Law
151 E. Griffith St.
Jackson, MS  39201
(601) 925-7141 (office)
(601) 925-7113 (fax)

>>> aebrownstein at ucdavis.edu 3/31/2008 3:58 PM >>>

Do you have the cite for McConnell’s dissent handy? From: religionlaw-bounces at lists.ucla.edu [mailto:religionlaw-bounces at lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Christopher Lund
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 1:40 PM
To: religionlaw at lists.ucla.edu 
Subject: Cert Grant in Summum

 The Supreme Court today granted cert in an unusual Ten Commandments case, Summum v. Pleasant Grove City.  The case was brought by a religious organization that wanted to put up its own religious monument in a city park, given that there was already a Ten Commandments display there.  The Tenth Circuit found for the plaintiffs, agreeing with them that the park was a traditional public forum from which the plaintiffs could only be excluded upon the showing of a compelling interest.  The panel's decision seems pretty dubious - I imagine the Supreme Court will reverse, with a logic along the lines of Judge McConnell's dissent from denial of rehearing en banc.
 
Best,
Chris
 
Christopher C. Lund
Assistant Professor of Law
Mississippi College School of Law
151 E. Griffith St.
Jackson, MS  39201
(601) 925-7141 (office)
(601) 925-7113 (fax)


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/religionlaw/attachments/20080331/0a1f9b33/attachment.htm