Establishment Clause and government action outside the U.S.

[Volokh, Eugene]

    Aha!  Lamont v. Woods, 948 F.2d 825 (2nd Cir. 1991) -- thanks very
much.  Special factoid bonus:  The second named plaintiff was Isaac
Asimov.
 
    Eugene


________________________________

	From: religionlaw-bounces at lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-bounces at lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Marc Stern
	Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 3:25 PM
	To: religionlaw at lists.ucla.edu
	Subject: Re: Establishment Clause and government action outside
the U.S.
	
	

	The case tou are lookin for is lamont imnvolving forein aid
channeled througjh churcjh groups
	
	----- Original Message -----
	From: religionlaw-bounces at lists.ucla.edu
<religionlaw-bounces at lists.ucla.edu>
	To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
<religionlaw at lists.ucla.edu>
	Sent: Thu Feb 21 18:19:06 2008
	Subject: Establishment Clause and government action outside the
U.S.
	
	        I vaguely recall that there was a case dealing with an
	Establishment Clause challenge to some government action outside
the
	U.S. -- perhaps government funding of certain religious
institutions or
	some such.  But my quick searches couldn't find it; can anyone
help me?
	Or am I just making it up?  (I did find the cases challenging
our
	reactions with the Vatican, one involving Fred Phelps of funeral
	picketing infamy.)
	
	        Eugene
	_______________________________________________
	To post, send message to Religionlaw at lists.ucla.edu
	To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
	
	Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be
viewed as private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages
that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can
(rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.