Conflicts between religious exercise and gay rights
Jean Dudley
jean.dudley at gmail.com
Tue Aug 5 09:32:50 PDT 2008
On Aug 5, 2008, at Tue, Aug 5, 9:02 AM, Engelken, Sheri wrote:
> Religious beliefs can serve as justifications for many types of
> conduct that we condemn, e.g., slavery, wife-beating, concubinage,
> genocide. Discrimination, be it based on race, ethnicity, gender,
> sexual preference, or other irrelevant personal status, is to be
> condemned. No one forces service providers to run and operate
> places of public accommodation. Choosing to do so, when it flies
> in the face of one's religious beliefs, is self-selected conflict.
> The individual discriminated again is not in a similar "choice"
> position. And telling victims of discrimination that they should
> look for alternatives -- non-discriminatory service providers -- is
> not a proper solution. That's reminiscent of black Americans
> facing Jim Crow practices being told "we don't serve blacks here"
> and having to look for and ultimately find alternative services
> where such practices weren't in use.
>
> Service providers with discriminatory religious beliefs don't face
> any restriction on their beliefs from public accommodations laws.
> They're just barred from engaging in unlawful conduct, i.e.,
> refusing to provide a non-religious service they willingly provide
> to others not in the class at issue. This isn't about whether you
> have to ordain women or allow people in the class to participate in
> religious activities in ways that impinge on religious beliefs.
> This is about whether providers of non-religious services (public
> accommodations) should be permitted to engage in the unlawful
> conduct of discrimination.
>
> SJE
>
> Sheri J Engelken
> Gonzaga University School of Law
> PO Box 3528; 721 N Cincinnati
> Spokane, WA 99220
> 509 313 5891
> sengelken at lawschool.gonzaga.edu
Devil's advocate:
It could be counter-argued that people seeking public services aren't
forced to do so, either. Why shouldn't customers be told to seek
alternate services?
Non-devil's advocate: I can see a few exceptions; The woman who is
prescribed oral contraceptives to treat a medical condition, and the
only pharmacist in the county refuses to dispense because of his
religious beliefs.
More information about the Religionlaw
mailing list