LOFTON / Re: Defamation of Religion
JOHN LOFTON
jlof at aol.com
Fri Aug 1 07:20:31 PDT 2008
In point of fact, strictly speaking, there is no such thing that actually exists that is called "religion." That's why I put it in quotes. "Religion" is an abstract category that no one actually practices any more than someone plays "sports" or eats "food." Thus, I do not believe you can "trivialize" that which does not actually exist. As for creating "conceptual and practical confusion," I believe this happens when one talks about unreal things as if they are real. In any event, if someone denies that all governments are "religious" in origin, and based on some kind of "religion," let's test what I say. Name me a government that you say is not "religious" and I'll show you how it is. Thank you.?
John Lofton, Editor, TheAmericanView.com
Recovering Republican
"Accursed is that peace of which revolt from God is the bond, and blessed are those contentions by which it is necessary to maintain the kingdom of Christ." -- John Calvin.
-----Original Message-----
From: RJLipkin at aol.com
To: religionlaw at lists.ucla.edu
Sent: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 6:52 am
Subject: Re: LOFTON / Re: Defamation of Religion
????????This certainly trivializes the concept of "religion." A government that persecutes theists, defames religion in general, and so forth is religious? I suppose the?argument is that such a government simply adopts the "wrong" religion.??I suppose similarly each individual is religious no matter what that person's view is about the existence of God or the practice of religion. Taking this route, however,? creates both?conceptual and practical confusion, but one is, of course, free to take it. To what end?
?
Bobby
??????
Robert Justin Lipkin
Professor of Law
Widener University School of Law
Delaware
Ratio Juris, Contributor:? http://ratiojuris.blogspot.com/
Essentially Contested America,?Editor-In-Chief http://www.essentiallycontestedamerica.org/
?
In a message dated 7/31/2008 5:38:45 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, jlof at aol.com writes:
ALL government is "religious." The only question is: Which "religion" will a government be based on.
Ratio Juris, Contributor:? http://ratiojuris.blogspot.com/
Essentially Contested America,?Editor-In-Chief http://www.essentiallycontestedamerica.org/
?
In a message dated 7/31/2008 5:38:45 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, jlof at aol.com writes:
ALL government is "religious." The only question is: Which "religion" will a government be based on.
?
In a message dated 7/31/2008 5:38:45 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, jlof at aol.com writes:
ALL government is "religious." The only question is: Which "religion" will a government be based on.
Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for FanHouse Fantasy Football today.
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw at lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the
messages to others.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/religionlaw/attachments/20080801/db554c50/attachment.htm
More information about the Religionlaw
mailing list