[spam] Re: And God files a response? (Was: Suing God (honest, it's a law...
RJLipkin at aol.com
RJLipkin at aol.com
Fri Sep 21 07:40:09 PDT 2007
In a message dated 9/21/2007 10:22:33 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
wlinden at panix.com writes:
And everyone involved seems to take it for granted which concept of "God"
applies. For instance, if it turns out to be Vishnu, He might do to Mr. Lipkin
what He, as Narasimha, did to King Hayanakasipu when asked to demonstrate His
omnipresence.
I intend my remarks to apply to any conception of God that includes
omniscience, omnipotence, and moral perfection. And I believe that conception
includes the God of Abrahamic religions. Moreover, American constitutionalism and
history invoke, if any God at all, the God of Abraham. However, regarding a
demonstration of the powers of any other God, my only response is: "Bring it
on!"
Bobby
Robert Justin Lipkin
Professor of Law
Widener University School of Law
Delaware
Ratio Juris
, Contributor: _ http://ratiojuris.blogspot.com/_
(http://ratiojuris.blogspot.com/)
Essentially Contested America, Editor-In-Chief
_http://www.essentiallycontestedamerica.org/_ (http://www.essentiallycontestedamerica.org/)
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/religionlaw/attachments/20070921/c5eda803/attachment.htm
More information about the Religionlaw
mailing list