[spam] Re: And God files a response? (Was: Suing God (honest, it's a law...

RJLipkin at aol.com RJLipkin at aol.com
Fri Sep 21 07:40:09 PDT 2007


 
 
In a message dated 9/21/2007 10:22:33 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
wlinden at panix.com writes:

And  everyone involved seems to take it for granted which concept of "God" 
applies.  For instance, if it turns out to be Vishnu, He might do to Mr. Lipkin 
what He,  as Narasimha, did to King Hayanakasipu when asked to demonstrate His 
 omnipresence.


I intend my remarks  to apply to any conception of God that includes 
omniscience, omnipotence, and  moral perfection.  And I believe that conception 
includes the God of  Abrahamic religions. Moreover, American constitutionalism and 
history  invoke, if any God at all, the God of Abraham. However, regarding a  
demonstration of the powers of any other God, my only response is: "Bring it  
on!"

Bobby

Robert Justin  Lipkin
Professor of Law
Widener University School of  Law
Delaware

Ratio Juris

,  Contributor: _  http://ratiojuris.blogspot.com/_ 
(http://ratiojuris.blogspot.com/) 
Essentially Contested  America, Editor-In-Chief 
_http://www.essentiallycontestedamerica.org/_ (http://www.essentiallycontestedamerica.org/) 



************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/religionlaw/attachments/20070921/c5eda803/attachment.htm 


More information about the Religionlaw mailing list