Recent Threads / "Proselytizing"

[John Lofton]

Of course not. The inventor of the Internet would NEVER do that because -- as he knows as a Baptist -- that would be whoring after false gods.


John Lofton, Editor, TheAmericanView.com
Recovering Republican

"Accursed is that peace of which revolt from God is the bond, and blessed are those contentions by which it is necessary to maintain the kingdom of Christ." -- John Calvin.


-----Original Message-----
From: Will Linden <wlinden at panix.com>
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics <religionlaw at lists.ucla.edu>
Sent: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:55 am
Subject: Re: Recent Threads / "Proselytizing" 



   My point is that the actual use of "proselytize" is loaded with Finagle 
Factors to exclude identical BEHAVIOR which does not include the speaker's 
wrath. We never hear that "Al Gore came to town to PROSELYTIZE for the 
Democrats!"



At 12:31 PM 9/6/07 -0400, you wrote:


>Christians are commanded to "proselytize" by the Lord: Mattew 28:16-20

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw at lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.


________________________________________________________________________
Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! - http://mail.aol.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/religionlaw/attachments/20070906/2be6e358/attachment.htm