Anti-gay church verdict
Joel Sogol
jlsatty at wwisp.com
Thu Nov 1 09:33:42 PDT 2007
Bsog
Joel L. Sogol
811 21st Ave.
Tuscaloosa, ALabama 35401
ph (205) 345-0966
fx (205) 345-0971
email: jlsatty at wwisp.com
Ben Franklin observed that truth wins a fair fight - which is why we have
evidence rules in U.S. courts.
-----Original Message-----
From: religionlaw-bounces at lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-bounces at lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Steven Jamar
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 11:22 AM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: Anti-gay church verdict
Could we not ban ALL demonstrations at funerals of private people?
That would be content neutral. And we can ban the greater, can we not
also ban the lesser? (And you know I hate referencing a Scalian
argument!)
Steve
On 11/1/07, Conkle, Daniel O. <conkle at indiana.edu> wrote:
>
>
> Isn't this analogous to Frisby, approving a ban on targeted picketing as
> "content-neutral" even though the "privacy" interest being protected in
> Frisby was, in reality, linked in substantial part to protecting
homeowners'
> from being offended by the content of picketers' speech? In Frisby, the
> Court cited Kovacs (yes, a regulation of loudspeaker noise indeed is
> content-neutral) but also Pacifica, which plainly turned on content.
See
> also Madsen and the other, more recent anti-abortion picketing cases, also
> finding prohibitions "content-neutral" when, in reality, a good part of
the
> harm being averted by the laws or injunctions in reality depended on
> content.
>
> So, yes, the interest and harm in this case in reality are linked in
> substantial part to content, albeit content in the particularly offensive
> context of a funeral, but I can well imagine the reasoning of Frisby and
the
> anti-abortion picketing cases being extended to support a
"content-neutral"
> conclusion.
>
>
> Dan Conkle
> *******************************************
> Daniel O. Conkle
> Robert H. McKinney Professor of Law
> Indiana University School of Law
> Bloomington, Indiana 47405
> (812) 855-4331
> fax (812) 855-0555
> e-mail conkle at indiana.edu
> *******************************************
>
--
Prof. Steven Jamar
Howard University School of Law
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw at lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.
More information about the Religionlaw
mailing list