Falwell: Not Necessarily The Person That You Think

[Sanford Levinson]

On this one I tend to agree with Will (unless we want to get into a discussion of Falwell v. Hustler, one of the shining lights of our contemporary jurisprudence!).
 
sandy

________________________________

From: religionlaw-bounces at lists.ucla.edu on behalf of Will Linden
Sent: Wed 5/16/2007 8:57 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: Falwell: Not Necessarily The Person That You Think



   OK, what are the LEGAL implications of Falwell's death? Or will the list
just become all-argue-about-Fawell, all the time?


Will Linden  wlinden at panix.com
http://www.ecben.net/
Magic Code: MAS/GD S++ W++ N+ PWM++ Ds/r+ A-> a++ C+ G- QO++ 666 Y
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw at lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 4296 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/religionlaw/attachments/20070516/f5e525d6/attachment.bin