Muslim Policewoman Barred from Wearing Khimar on the Job:

[Volokh, Eugene]

	FYI, in case you're interested. 

-----Original Message-----
From: volokh-bounces at lists.powerblogs.com
[mailto:volokh-bounces at lists.powerblogs.com] On Behalf Of
notify at powerblogs.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 4:50 PM
To: volokh at lists.powerblogs.com
Subject: [Volokh] Eugene Volokh: Muslim Policewoman Barred from
WearingKhimar on the Job:

Posted by Eugene Volokh:
Muslim Policewoman Barred from Wearing Khimar on the Job:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_06_10-2007_06_16.shtml#118177859
7


   The khimar is "a headpiece ... which covers the hair, forehead, sides
   of the head, neck, shoulders, and chest," but not, at least in this
   instance, the face.

   Philadelphia Police Department Directive 78 apparently prescribes a
   [1]uniform uniform, with no exceptions for any religious apparel or
   any religious symbols. The case suggests that the uniform requirement
   is broad enough to exclude ashes on the forehead on Ash Wednesday,
and
   therefore basically any non-uniform symbols.

   Police officer Kimberlie Webb claimed that Title VII of the Civil
   Rights Act of 1964 required the city to accommodate her religious
   practice by exempting her from the strict uniformity requirement, and
   letting her wear the khimar. Title VII does require employers to
   provide exemptions for employees whose religions conflict with
   generally applicable work rules, but not when granting such an
   exemption would create an "undue hardship" for the employer. Courts
   have set the "undue hardship" bar pretty low, so that anything "more
   than a de minimus cost" would constitute an "undue hardship" that the
   employer need not bear.

   The court [http://howappealing.law.com/WebbVsPhiladelphia.pdf] held
that requiring a religious exemption from Directive 78
   would indeed create an "undue hardship":

     The Directive's detailed standards with no accomodation for
     religious symbols and attire not only promote the need for
     uniformity, but also enhance cohesiveness, cooperation, and the
     esprit de corps of the police force. Prohibiting religious symbols
     and attire helps to prevent any divisiveness on the basis of
     religion both within the force itself and when it encounters the
     diverse population of Philadelphia.... Police Directive 78 is
     designed to maintain religious neutrality, but in this case in a
     para-military organization for the good not only of the police
     officers themselves but also of the public in general.

References

   1. http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/004591.html

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
Volokh at lists.powerblogs.com
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh