Landmark First Amendment Religion Litigation?

[Lawyer2974 at aol.com]

In a message dated 1/26/2007 5:53:14 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
VOLOKH at law.ucla.edu writes:
In the hybrid rights section, Scalia wrote, "And it is easy to
envision a case in which a challenge on freedom of association grounds
would likewise be reinforced by Free Exercise Clause concerns."  I
wouldn't exactly call this express, but it does seem designed to leave
open room precisely for the ministerial exception.

    Eugene
Unfortunately I am working form memory at the moment but that memory is that 
it was precisely in this section that footnotes included some of the 
ministerial exception case(s)

Donald C. Clark, Jr.
2333 Waukegan Road
Suite 160
Bannockburn, Illinois 60015
847-236-0900
847-236-0909 (fax)


This message is a PRIVATE communication. This message and all attachments
are a private communication sent by a law firm and may be confidential or
protected by privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the
information contained in or attached to this message is strictly
prohibited.  Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to
this message, and then delete it from your system.  Thank you.


******************************************************************************
**************************

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure:  To comply with requirements imposed by the
IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained herein
(including any attachments), unless specifically stated otherwise, is not
intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purposes of (i)
avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting,
marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter
herein.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/religionlaw/attachments/20070126/5b03db07/attachment.html