Pagan religion
Steven Jamar
stevenjamar at gmail.com
Tue Dec 18 05:32:36 PST 2007
Well, I guess the Pagans I know would disagree with this almost as
much as they disagree about the exact doctrine of Paganism or as
Christians disagree about various Christian doctrines.
Pagan does not mean just "not me" or just "not monotheists". The
Roman and Greeks were described by Christians as pagans, -- but they
surely had religious beliefs and so far as I recall did not call
themselves pagans.
Pagans are not all atheists.
And I saw no one here asserting a trademark.
As to capitalization -- depends on the usage, doesn't it.
Steve
On Dec 17, 2007, at 11:30 PM, Will Linden wrote:
> At 06:28 PM 12/16/07 -0800, you wrote:
>
> There is no religion of "Paganism". "Pagans" are defined by what
> they
> are NOT. (And as a poster on Magicknet said, "I might as well call
> myself
> Not Tom Mix."
>
> If you object to that, you can start by getting atheists to stop
> using
> "pagan" and "heathen". I am sure they will be cooperative as soon
> as you
> tell them they are violating your trademark.
>
>
>
>
>
>> BTW, since Paganism is a religious group, like Christianity, its
>> self-
>> identified members should be called Pagans, not "pagans".
>> Jean
>> On Dec 16, 2007, at Sun, Dec 16, 12:48 PM, Will Linden wrote:
>>
>>> Since people are worrying about "the right" having the nerve to
>>> extol
>>> their own religion(s), I note that I got no reactions to this one
>>> back in
>>> January, so i post it again::
>>>
>>>
>>> Net.gossip is now giving its attention to Sharkey "the Impaler"
>>> announcing that he is running for governor of Minnesota as the
>>> "Vampyre's
>>> Witches and Pagans Party". (Any pagans present go yell at him, not
>>> me...
>>> http://johnathonforgovernor.us), with a platform which calls for
>>> the public
>>> impalement of "convicted terrorists".
>>>
>>> I found on reading his agenda that he proposes to
>>>
>>>
>>> "erect the "Wall of Religious
>>> Beliefs" in the Capital. This wall will have everything
>>> from the Wiccan Rede to the 10 Commandments."
>>>
>>> So, is this project considered sufficiently nondiscriminatory? Or
>>> would
>>> it be assailed as an establishment of "religion", as opposed to
>>> irreligion?
>>> Or does the aim of extolling religious freedom constitute an
>>> overriding
>>> secular purpose?
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> To post, send message to Religionlaw at lists.ucla.edu
>>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
>>> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
>>>
>>> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed
>>> as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages
>>> that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members
>>> can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> To post, send message to Religionlaw at lists.ucla.edu
>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
>> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
>>
>> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
>> private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
>> posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can
>> (rightly or
>> wrongly) forward the messages to others.
>
> _______________________________________________
> To post, send message to Religionlaw at lists.ucla.edu
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
>
> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed
> as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages
> that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members
> can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
--
Prof. Steven D. Jamar vox: 202-806-8017
Howard University School of Law fax: 202-806-8567
2900 Van Ness Street NW mailto:stevenjamar at gmail.com
Washington, DC 20008 http://iipsj.com/SDJ/
"I care not what subject is taught if only it be taught well."
Thomas H. Huxley
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/religionlaw/attachments/20071218/e31ac3a3/attachment.htm
More information about the Religionlaw
mailing list