The Impaler's Wall

Jean Dudley jean.dudley at gmail.com
Sun Dec 16 18:28:32 PST 2007


The only way I can view this is as satire.  Come on;  impalement?  He  
can't be serious.  As for the wall of religious beliefs, it's going  
to have to be a very long wall.  I personally can think of several  
issues that need the money more desperately.  But I'll give him a A  
for inclusive thinking.

BTW, since Paganism is a religious group, like Christianity, its self- 
identified members should be called Pagans, not "pagans".
Jean
On Dec 16, 2007, at Sun, Dec 16,  12:48 PM, Will Linden wrote:

>   Since people are worrying about "the right" having the nerve to  
> extol
> their own religion(s), I note that I got no reactions to this one  
> back in
> January, so i post it again::
>
>
>   Net.gossip is now giving its attention to Sharkey "the Impaler"
> announcing that he is running for governor of Minnesota as the  
> "Vampyre's
> Witches and Pagans Party". (Any pagans present go yell at him, not  
> me...
> http://johnathonforgovernor.us), with a platform which calls for  
> the public
> impalement of "convicted terrorists".
>
>     I found on reading his agenda that he proposes to
>
>
> "erect the "Wall of Religious
> Beliefs" in the Capital. This wall will have everything
> from the Wiccan Rede to the 10 Commandments."
>
>   So, is this project considered sufficiently nondiscriminatory? Or  
> would
> it be assailed as an establishment of "religion", as opposed to  
> irreligion?
> Or does the aim of extolling religious freedom constitute an  
> overriding
> secular purpose?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To post, send message to Religionlaw at lists.ucla.edu
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see  
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
>
> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed  
> as private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages  
> that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members  
> can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.



More information about the Religionlaw mailing list