alarming new law?
RJLipkin at aol.com
RJLipkin at aol.com
Sun Dec 16 09:08:41 PST 2007
Steve Jamar writes:
I pretty much put this into the "get a life" category on all sides. If
Congress wants to do these things, they seem harmless enough. And if some people
want to get vexed about it, well it is just their day being ruined.
I'm not sure how a simple question such as mine gets put into the '"get a
life category,"' but just in case anyone is interested, I do have one.
Seeking answers to questions about congressional authorization in
general seems central to understanding American constitutional law. But Steve
is quite right. Grading, meeting publications deadlines, and so forth are
currently more important. So I promise not to "get vexed" about this issue or
spend time too much time right not thinking about one of the central questions
in any constitutional democracy.
Bobby
Robert Justin Lipkin
Professor of Law
Widener University School of Law
Delaware
Ratio Juris
, Contributor: _ http://ratiojuris.blogspot.com/_
(http://ratiojuris.blogspot.com/)
Essentially Contested America, Editor-In-Chief
_http://www.essentiallycontestedamerica.org/_ (http://www.essentiallycontestedamerica.org/)
**************************************See AOL's top rated recipes
(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/religionlaw/attachments/20071216/a311b2ca/attachment.htm
More information about the Religionlaw
mailing list