FW: 75% of Minneapolis airport taxis refuse customers with
alcohol
Will Linden
wlinden at panix.com
Fri Sep 29 20:32:29 PDT 2006
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Paul Finkelman wrote:
> Sounds like Plessy v. Ferguson to me. Separate but equal cabs. No
> way.
>
> How far are we willing to take this: what if they say they won't carry
> people who wear a cross a necklace with the Buddha (a pagan symbol for a
> devout Muslim); what about a Chistian cab driver who won't pick up
> someone with muslim or sikh garb? It seems to me that this is a civil
> rights violation on the part of a common carrier. The Taxi driver gets
> a license to carry peopel from place to place and may not discriminate
> on the basis of religion or race or anything else.
>
I believe the difference is that there is a specific precept against "its
grower and its presser and its CARRIER". The other examples do not involve
any transgression by the *driver*.
Will Linden wlinden at panix.com
http://www.ecben.net/
Magic Code: MAS/GD S++ W++ N+ PWM++ Ds/r+ A-> a++ C+ G- QO++ 666 Y
More information about the Religionlaw
mailing list