The Roberts Court

[Marc Stern]

I would add that an early Establishment Clause challenge to RLUIPA's
land use provisions seems likely, as does  renewed litigation about
charitable choice-i.e., the Iowa prison litigation. Perhaps too the
Court will look at the growing split about the ministerial exception to
Title VII.
Marc Stern 

-----Original Message-----
From: religionlaw-bounces at lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-bounces at lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Volokh, Eugene
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 9:45 AM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: The Roberts Court

    I'd think that the government religious speech cases might be coming
back, because the last attempted resolution (in the Ten Commandments
cases) is likely to prove quite unadministrable, and because there's a
decent chance that now there are five votes to jettison the endorsement
test.
 
    Eugene


________________________________

	From: religionlaw-bounces at lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-bounces at lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Tepker, Rick
	Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 5:38 AM
	To: religionlaw at lists.ucla.edu
	Subject: The Roberts Court
	
	
		What issues concerning the First Amendment's religion
clauses are likely to be the earliest to come before the Roberts Court?
I'd appreciate any predictions or guesses from the list.
	
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw at lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly
or wrongly) forward the messages to others.