Dover Intelligent-Design Case
Lupu
iclupu at law.gwu.edu
Tue Dec 20 13:12:28 PST 2005
In light of the judge's appraisal of the behavior of the Board
members, do members of the list think that punitive damages might
have been awarded against particular Board members had they
been sued individually? Would their ordinary immunity from
damages have been lost as a result of what now looks like a wilful,
bad faith violation of the Constitution? Would an award of punitive
damages against them have been an appropriate remedy?
(Perhaps plaintiffs' counsel feared that such an award would
generate some sympathy for the individual defendants, and
backlash against the plaintiffs. Obtaining money, of course, was not
the point of the suit -- but such a remedy would certainly deter the
next school board that headed in this direction.)
Chip Lupu
On 20 Dec 2005 at 15:56, Ed Brayton wrote:
>
> Marc Stern wrote:
> Were there any interveners? Might Discovery Institute intervene
> for purposes of appeal? .During the fight over equal access, the
> Supreme Court held in Bender v. Williamsport ASD,475 US 534 that a
> single school board member did not have standing to appeal a
> decision to allow religious clubs .A fortiori former members
> should lack standing, unless ,perhaps they were sued in an
> individual capacity and held for damages.
>
> The Foundation for Thought and Ethics attempted to intervene but was
> denied. Discovery Institute did not attempt to intervene. This suit,
> as far as I know, was only against the school district as a whole, not
> against the individual members of the school board. There are no
> damages awarded and none asked for. So I can't imagine there is anyone
> with standing that could intervene at this point. The school board has
> said that they will not file an appeal of the case.
>
> Ed Brayton
>
Ira C. ("Chip") Lupu
F. Elwood & Eleanor Davis Professor of Law
The George Washington University Law School
2000 H St., NW
Washington D.C 20052
(202) 994-7053
ICLUPU at main.nlc.gwu.edu
ICLUPU at law.gwu.edu
More information about the Religionlaw
mailing list