UC system sued

[JMHACLJ at aol.com]

In a message dated 8/28/2005 12:56:19 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
stcynic at crystalauto.com writes:


Set aside the likelihood of success on litigation of this particular  
challenge.  Ask this question instead.  Why would a public  university system decide 
to jeopardize its commitment from the people of the  state and the legislature 
-- its necessary source of funding and the  legislative grant of its 
existence -- to beard the lion of Christianized  Christian schools? 



I have no idea what this  odd prose means, but it appears to be entirely 
irrelevant
Try this on for size.  University exists at public grace.   University is 
funded with public dollars.  That same public has chosen to  accommodate 
religious needs by creating a statutory framework for schools with  religious 
affiliations.  University tells public and religious schools to  take a hike because 
it knows better how things out to be.
 
Seems pretty clear, as it was before.  
 
Jim Henderson
Senior Counsel
ACLJ
 
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/religionlaw/attachments/20050828/7c362889/attachment.html