Findings on Hostility at Smithsonian Noted in NRO Article
JMHACLJ at aol.com
JMHACLJ at aol.com
Wed Aug 24 04:45:39 PDT 2005
In a message dated 8/23/2005 7:36:13 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
edarrell at sbcglobal.net writes:
In 2003 the Justice Department investigated a report of religious
discrimination at Texas Tech University, where a popular and tough biology professor
required students to pass his classes in biology before he'd write them a
recommendation to medical school. He also required kids to explain evolution to
him, to indicate that they understood the science. The protesting student
argued it was a religious burden to try to meet those qualifications.
It would appear that religious students are not driven from science so much
as they ask science to be changed to accommodate them, from anecdotal
evidence.
That certainly reflects a re-writing of the history of that episode. I
visited Professor Dini's webpage during his witch-burning era (when he warned
students who doubted the fact of evolution that they would not be, in his
opinion, suitable for further scientific training and that they would, therefore,
be ineligible for a reference to higher education by him). He was, of course,
welcome to his opinion, but he made a place of public accommodation very
unwelcome on grounds of religion and deservedly drew on himself the heat and
focus of the DOJ. And, at the end of it all, he took down his offensively
noxious declaration.
Particulary troublesome about your rewrite is the fact that it was only
after he was the subject of a DOJ investigation that he changed his requirement
from expressing affirmatively a belief in the truth of evolution with the
requirement that students be able to explain the theory. See
_http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2003/April/03_crt_247.htm_
(http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2003/April/03_crt_247.htm) .
Jim Henderson
Senior Counsel
ACLJ
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/religionlaw/attachments/20050824/5b50ed8d/attachment.htm
More information about the Religionlaw
mailing list