Increase in No Religion?

[Sanford Levinson]

Frank writes:  


All that I am suggesting is that religious claims are of a wide variety, some depending on revelation (as you correctly suggest) and others that depend on arguments whose premises do not appeal to such notions.  What I am saying is that a religious claim should not be dismissed out of hand, but the arguments offered for it assessed on their merits.  


I think we are in fundamental agreement, but I do wonder whether anyone on the list who believes in revealed truths (and who make recourse to such truths as part of their arguments) could possibly join in.
 
sandy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 3341 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/religionlaw/attachments/20050807/4ee535c6/attachment.bin