Lamb's Chapel: Right or Wrong?

[RJLipkin at aol.com]

I understand Lamb's  Chapel to say that while the government, in certain 
contexts, can  restrict certain subject matter, such as religion, it cannot permit 
the  discussion of particular subjects such as child rearing yet at the same  
time prohibit a religious viewpoint on child rearing.  I suppose the  
opposing view is that if the topic of religion can be restricted so can  religious 
viewpoints on permissible topics.  If I've got this  contrast right, is there a 
particular discussion in the literature which  comprehensively examines these 
opposing views. I ask forgiveness of  those List member whose work on this 
topic I've overlooked. I'd be  happy to receive replies off-list.  Thanks.
 
Bobby
 
Robert Justin  Lipkin
Professor of Law
Widener University School of  Law
Delaware
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/religionlaw/attachments/20050425/edaeb456/attachment.html