The President and the Pope
RJLipkin at aol.com
RJLipkin at aol.com
Mon Jun 14 09:27:18 PDT 2004
In a message dated 6/14/2004 11:49:23 AM Eastern Standard Time,
adsarwal at dcappeals.com writes:
did not force you to discuss the denial of communion aspect of the story.
You did that yourself when you said:
"This does not mean that I would hesitate to vote against a president who
asked the Pope to instruct American bishops to denounce action I approve
of."
The "action that I approve of" in the context of this story has to be Kerry
taking communion in violation of Church norms.
I'm afraid the above fails to observe an elementary distinction between a
constitutional issue and a political or policy issue. I might believe that
nothing in the Constitution prohibits a President from asking the Pope to urge
his Bishops to act in a certain manner while at the same time believing that
for political reasons it is a bad idea. Thus, I might defend a President's
constitutional prerogative to consult with the Pope, but simultaneously
embrace the proposition that guys I want to be president not engage in such
conduct. Similarly, it might be constitutionally permissible for a President to
invade Iraq, but that doesn't mean I shouldn't vote against a President who does
so if my conception of what's right should counsel me to do so. The ideas of
the right and the good are not exhausted by what is constitutionally
permissible.
While I always welcome "aid[s] [to my] understanding," let me
reiterate: what is religiously proper concerning who should and who should not take
communion is entirely irrelevant to the question of whether the President's
conduct in consulting the Pope is constitutionally permissible. I do not see
that the distinction between the religious question and the constitutional
question is in any way novel, but it is important to adhere to it nonetheless.
Bobby
Robert Justin Lipkin
Widener University School of Law
Delaware
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/religionlaw/attachments/20040614/437d3cff/attachment.htm
More information about the Religionlaw
mailing list