proselytization

[RJLipkin at aol.com]

In a message dated 12/21/2004 11:19:50 AM Eastern Standard Time,  
JMHACLJ at aol.com writes:

But I am also certain that in the peculiar confines of the dialogue over  the 
role of religion in the public schools, its appearance almost always  marks 
the entry of particular voices in the dialogue.
 



I'm not sure why this  should be relevant. If the term is typically used by a 
particular party in a  certain type of context, then engage that party by 
asking him or her  to  explain the term's use, and then argue against this use if 
it's incorrect.  Why not take this approach rather than seeming to disable 
the term even when  used to describe conversations about religion between 
neighbors?
 
Bobby
 
Robert Justin  Lipkin
Professor of Law
Widener University School of  Law
Delaware
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/religionlaw/attachments/20041221/2647fbda/attachment.html