Steven Williams Case - more factual information .:.

[Menard, Richard H.]

Come on.  Are these tits and tats really what this list is for?  A little
restraint goes a long way.

-----Original Message-----
From: religionlaw-bounces at lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-bounces at lists.ucla.edu]On Behalf Of Newsom Michael
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 4:53 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Steven Williams Case - more factual information .:.



No, that isn't the rub.  There is nothing like the EC that speaks to either
biology or oxygen.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: JMHACLJ at aol.com [mailto:JMHACLJ at aol.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 3:53 PM
To: religionlaw at lists.ucla.edu
Subject: Re: Steven Williams Case - more factual information

 

In a message dated 12/15/2004 3:47:17 PM Eastern Standard Time,
mnewsom at law.howard.edu writes:

Rather than saddling teachers with a burden, perhaps the better course of
action is not to try to "teach" religion in the public schools at all.

Of course, one might try to teach biology without discussing oxygen.  Can it
be done?  Sure.  Should it be done?  That, my friend, is the rub.

 

Jim Henderson

Senior Counsel

ACLJ


Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP mail server made the following annotations on 12/15/2004, 04:06:50 PM
---------------------------------------------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us immediately.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/religionlaw/attachments/20041215/e09e03b4/attachment.htm