On topic discussion regarding homosexuality

[FRAP428 at aol.com]

I will have to mull over Alan's response as well as the others.  I guess that 
as I have encountered issues or as issues have emerged or changed in society, 
I have missed having the fine minds of my law professors around to "chew 
over" my ruminations. 

Regarding what Alan said regarding defining a religion, I have a somewhat 
narrower and more legalistic (constitutional?) definition. If it (the belief 
system) would support a Free Exercise claim, then it is a religion. If not, then 
no--it is not a religion. 

Frances R. A. Paterson, J.D., Ed.D.
Associate Professor
Department of Educational Leadership
Valdosta State University
Valdosta, GA 31698
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/religionlaw/attachments/20040412/a242432d/attachment.htm