FYI An Interesting Case

[JMHACLJ at aol.com]

Of course, to describe the policy at issue as progressive is to betray a 
certain bias about it.  A bias contrary to the one I have revealed in responding 
thus.  But discourse about the legal and constitutional issues at stake can so 
easily be clouded by the decision to characterize one side with such laudatory 
or noble motivations, particularly since it would, in this case, leave one 
with the negative pregnant impression about the contrarian view.

Jim Henderson
Senior Counsel
ACLJ
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/religionlaw/attachments/20040407/aff54164/attachment.htm