Adultery in the army
Harold Hallikainen
haroldhallikainen at JUNO.COM
Wed Mar 26 15:47:08 PST 1997
On Wed, 26 Mar 1997 13:02:10 -0500 Arthur Spitzer <ArtSpitzer at AOL.COM>
writes:
>
> I had not intended to become the defender of the UCMJ on this
>list, but I
>don't think people's feelings, and possible actions, toward a person
>who has
>sex with their spouse has anything to do with religion. My athiest
>and
>agnostic friends do not think adultery is a *sin,* but most of them
>would
>still be highly upset, and angry at the perpetrator, if they
>discovered
>themselves to be an adulteree.
Which "perpetrator" would one be angry at? The spouse with whom
one had an understanding, or the other "perp"? Probably both...
Harold
More information about the Religionlaw
mailing list