[Oradlist] FW: Dicom printer for panoramic

Wed May 13 09:34:08 PDT 2009

Very strange. We have a small local network 3 computers. One jet printer and
one Sony UP-D74XRD. I can use any printer from any computer. I think at you
a problem with network options. May be it connected through USB and then you
cannot print far off. Try to connect it through a network cable.

2009/5/13 Mansur Ahmad <ahmad005 at umn.edu>

>  We have the Sony UP-D72XR. It is a DICOM printer. Print quality is great,
> but we have a few issues with this. It requires a dedicated computer (cannot
> be shared with another printer). I could not connect this printer to my
> workstation as I already have a laser printer connected. If I need a print,
> I have move from my workstation to another computer and then recreate the
> desired slices. The film/paper size is 8x10 inches, which is good as the
> prints easily fit inside our chart (we are not fully digital yet). To print
> an image from iCATVision is also a hassle, as you cannot create a default
> paper size of 8x10.
>
>
>
> Because of these hassles, this printer mostly collects dust than work.
>
>
>
> Mansur
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* oradlist-bounces at lists.ucla.edu [mailto:
> oradlist-bounces at lists.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *Craig Dial
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:52 AM
> *To:* Oral Radiology Discussion Group
> *Subject:* Re: [Oradlist] FW: Dicom printer for panoramic
>
>
>
>
>
> The Codonics printers are excellent, we own several models and they all
> have been great. An alternative printer that has less cost, but equal in
> print quality is the Sony models. We own several of these printers also. The
> can also print in paper or transparency (blue film), and they have a color
> model as well. The downside is they are not DICOM printers, and the maximum
> print size is 8.5x11.
>
>
>
> The cost for a new gray scale Sony UP-D72XR is about $6,000.00. The cost
> per sheet of film is about $.70 for paper and $1.14 for transparency The
> Sony color model UP-D75MD is $1,900.00 and the cost per color sheet of media
> is $1.09
>
>
>
> Craig Dial
>
> Diagnostic Digital Imaging
>
> www.DDICenters.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* oradlist-bounces at lists.ucla.edu [mailto:
> oradlist-bounces at lists.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *Stuart C. White
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 13, 2009 8:29 AM
> *To:* Oradlist
> *Subject:* [Oradlist] FW: Dicom printer for panoramic
>
> We've also been using a Codonics printer at UCLA for many years. Its main
> virtues are excellent images, either transparencies in multiple sizes or
> color or black and white paper prints. Also, if it breaks down (twice in 6-7
> years in our experience), the company sends out a replacement machine
> overnight ready for work the next morning.
>
> Stuart White
>
>
>
> ------ Forwarded Message
> From: Allan Farman <agfarm01 at louisville.edu>
> Reply-To: Oradlist <oradlist at lists.ucla.edu>
> Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 10:02:39 -0400
> To: Oradlist <oradlist at lists.ucla.edu>
> Subject: Re: [Oradlist] Dicom printer for panoramic
>
> I concur with what is said about the Codonics. I have used one for 5
> years with print capabilities up to 17" x 14", monochrome paper,
> monochrome transparency and color paper capabilities. It is not cheap in
> initial outlay or in the paper/transparency supplies; however, if you
> need printing capacity it is first rate. We use is primarily for CBCT
> output, but also for all panoramic radiographs made in the Radiology
> Clinic. One of the reasons for purchasing a top of the line medical
> model was to ensure rapidity of printing throughput.
>
> Allan G. Farman, BDS, PhD, MBA, DSc, Diplomate ABOMR
>
> Prof. Radiology & Imaging Science
> Univ. Louisville School of Dentistry: SUHD
> 501 South Preston Street,
> Louisville, Kentucky 40292, USA
>
> Tel: +1(502) 852.1241
> Fax: +1(502)852.1626
>
>
> >>> Ricardo Urzúa <ricurzua at gmail.com> 5/13/2009 8:48 AM >>>
> Dr. Fidler,
> . Since  3 years ago we are using Codonics printer, not only for
> panoramics
> and cephs, also for cone beam prints. Its a very good machine, fast and
> very
> good images quality.
>
> Dr. Ricardo Urzua
> Prof Radiology. Universidad del Desarrollo
> Santiago, Chile
>
> 2009/5/13 Roberto Molteni <rmolteni at afpimaging.com>
>
> >  Verona, 2009 May 13th
> >
> >
> >
> > Dr. Fidler:
> >
> > Question: if you have no PACS, and consequently (I assume) all your
> digital
> > panoramic operations will be local (point-to-point from the computer
> > controlling the Panoramic machine to the printer), then why do you
> feel that
> > you need a DICOM printer, as opposed to a less-expensive non-dicom
> printer
> > with standard Windows drivers?
> >
> > Is it because - generally speaking - DICOM printers offer
> better-diagnostic
> > print quality than non-DICOM printers (but there are
> good-image-quality
> > non-DICOM printers too). Or is it in anticipation of future needs,
> or
> > because of the wider range of print media (= more
> radiology-oriented)
> > usually available with DICOM printers, or ... ?
> >
> >
> >
> > Roberto Molteni
> >
> > CTO, QR/AFP Imaging/Dent-X
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* oradlist-bounces at lists.ucla.edu [mailto:
> > oradlist-bounces at lists.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *Aleš Fidler
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, 2009 May 13 09:01
> > *To:* oradlist at lists.ucla.edu
> > *Subject:* [Oradlist] Dicom printer for panoramic
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear Oradlisters,
> >
> >
> >
> > on our University hospital we will upgrade to digital panoramic. So
> for we
> > don't have PACS so images will have to printed. I would appreciate if
> you
> > could share your experiences with DICOM printers (reliability, speed,
> time
> > to first printed page, cost of printing, etc.)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Thank you for your help!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > Aleš Fidler
> >   ------------------------------
> >
> > doc. dr. Aleš Fidler, dr.dent.med
> >
> > Specialist za zobne bolezni in endodontijo
> >
> > Stomatološka klinika Ljubljana
> >
> > Katedra za zoben bolezni in normalno morfologijo zobnega organa
> >
> >
> >
> > Asist. Prof. Aleš Fidler, DMD, PhD
> >
> > Endodontist
> >
> > University of Ljubljana, Department of endodntics and restorative
> dentistry
> >
> > Slovenia
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Oradlist mailing list
> > Oradlist at lists.ucla.edu
> > http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/oradlist
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Oradlist mailing list
> Oradlist at lists.ucla.edu
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/oradlist
>
> ------ End of Forwarded Message
>
> _______________________________________________
> Oradlist mailing list
> Oradlist at lists.ucla.edu
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/oradlist
>
>

-- 
Best regards,
Vasiliy Grachev.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/private/oradlist/attachments/20090513/a20c3cae/attachment-0001.htm>