[Oradlist] Oradlist Digest, Vol 52, Issue 15

Wed Feb 27 12:17:15 PST 2008

I dont know about any disposition that forces to use CT for planing implant
instalation. But after working more than a year with Cone Beam CT , each day
I  think is most necesary to use CT, to avoid not only clinical
complications but also legal problems
Ricardo Urzúa

2008/2/27, oradlist-request at lists.ucla.edu <oradlist-request at lists.ucla.edu
>:
>
> Send Oradlist mailing list submissions to
>        oradlist at lists.ucla.edu
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/oradlist
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        oradlist-request at lists.ucla.edu
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        oradlist-owner at lists.ucla.edu
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Oradlist digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1.  ct scan obligation? (Amnon)
>   2. Re:  ct scan obligation? (Stelt, PF. van der)
>   3. Re:  ct scan obligation? (EOrpe at aol.com)
>   4. Re:  ct scan obligation? (Ruprecht, Axel)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:44:16 -0500
> From: "Amnon" <panorama at inter.net.il>
> Subject: [Oradlist] ct scan obligation?
> To: "PI Oradlist" <oradlist at lists.ucla.edu>
> Message-ID: <00b501c878c0$bc7f1c40$64a8a8c0 at Fujitsu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hi Friends,
>
>
>
> Do you know of any publication / recommendation / regulation, by any
> official body / Association
>
> About the necessity or even the obligation to take ct scans for implant
> planning???
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Amnon
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/private/oradlist/attachments/20080226/d4e490be/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 06:52:25 +0100
> From: "Stelt, PF. van der" <P.vd.Stelt at acta.nl>
> Subject: Re: [Oradlist] ct scan obligation?
> To: "Oral Radiology Discussion Group" <oradlist at lists.ucla.edu>
> Message-ID: <1ABD35EE99375741A61DAE6673B4BA178FE5EF at member15.acta.nl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> You can try the ADA or European referal criteria:
>
> - European:
> http://ec.europa.eu/energy/nuclear/radioprotection/publication/136_en.htm<
> http://ec.europa.eu/energy/nuclear/radioprotection/publication/136_en.htm>
> - ADA: http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/radhealth/adaxray.html
>
> CT-scan can never be obligatory.
>
> Best regards,
> Paul van  derf  Stelt
>
>
> ==========================================
> Paul F. van der Stelt, DDS, PhD
> Professor, Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
> Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA)
> Louwesweg 1, 1066 EA Amsterdam, the Netherlands
> tel. +31-20-5188262   fax +31-20-5188480
> e-mail: p.vdstelt at acta.nl
> ==========================================
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: oradlist-bounces at lists.ucla.edu on behalf of Amnon
> Sent: Tue 2/26/2008 22:44
> To: PI Oradlist
> Subject: [Oradlist] ct scan obligation?
>
>
>
> Hi Friends,
>
>
>
> Do you know of any publication / recommendation / regulation, by any
> official body / Association
>
> About the necessity or even the obligation to take ct scans for implant
> planning???
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Amnon
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/ms-tnef
> Size: 6155 bytes
> Desc: not available
> Url :
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/private/oradlist/attachments/20080227/89991a0d/attachment-0001.bin
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 01:00:15 EST
> From: EOrpe at aol.com
> Subject: Re: [Oradlist] ct scan obligation?
> To: oradlist at lists.ucla.edu
> Message-ID: <d10.1eb68c05.34f6566f at aol.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> The American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology recommends "some
> form of cross-sectional imaging" for implant planning as documented
> in  the
> Parameters of Radiological Care article published in OOOOE May  2001.  At
> the time
> of this article, conventional tomography was the method  of choice in most
> cases.
>
> Elaine Orpe
>
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/private/oradlist/attachments/20080227/f4921f77/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:23:37 -0600
> From: "Ruprecht, Axel" <axel-ruprecht at uiowa.edu>
> Subject: Re: [Oradlist] ct scan obligation?
> To: "Oral Radiology Discussion Group" <oradlist at lists.ucla.edu>
> Message-ID:
>        <6A490BD35632EF48871355D69A79517C016B66E2 at IOWAEVS02.iowa.uiowa.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> I looked up what is in the 2004 European guidelines. I would say that
> they are definitely out of date, in that CBCT, which would answer some
> of their "disadvantages" is not included, unless they lump it into CT,
> in which case they would be of questionable clarity and accuracy.
>
>
>
> Just my humble opinion.
>
>
>
> Rgds
>
> Axel
>
>
>
> From: oradlist-bounces at lists.ucla.edu
> [mailto:oradlist-bounces at lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Stelt, PF. van der
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 11:52 PM
> To: Oral Radiology Discussion Group
> Subject: RE: [Oradlist] ct scan obligation?
>
>
>
> You can try the ADA or European referal criteria:
>
>
>
> - European:
> http://ec.europa.eu/energy/nuclear/radioprotection/publication/136_en.ht
> m
> <http://ec.europa.eu/energy/nuclear/radioprotection/publication/136_en.h
> tm>
>
> - ADA: http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/radhealth/adaxray.html
>
>
>
> CT-scan can never be obligatory.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Paul van  derf  Stelt
>
>
>
>
>
> ==========================================
>
> Paul F. van der Stelt, DDS, PhD
>
> Professor, Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
>
> Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA)
>
> Louwesweg 1, 1066 EA Amsterdam, the Netherlands
>
> tel. +31-20-5188262   fax +31-20-5188480
>
> e-mail: p.vdstelt at acta.nl
>
> ==========================================
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: oradlist-bounces at lists.ucla.edu on behalf of Amnon
> Sent: Tue 2/26/2008 22:44
> To: PI Oradlist
> Subject: [Oradlist] ct scan obligation?
>
> Hi Friends,
>
>
>
> Do you know of any publication / recommendation / regulation, by any
> official body / Association
>
> About the necessity or even the obligation to take ct scans for implant
> planning???
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Amnon
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/private/oradlist/attachments/20080227/1859b2c6/attachment.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Oradlist mailing list
> Oradlist at lists.ucla.edu
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/oradlist
>
>
> End of Oradlist Digest, Vol 52, Issue 15
> ****************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/private/oradlist/attachments/20080227/32accf3d/attachment.htm 