R: R: Re: R:Re: newtom

[Radiololgia Pasta]

Dear Bianchi,
we don't personally know still each other but we will certainly meet there
to Glasgow.
I want to thank you for your interesting intervention that seems me very
appropriate to the problem.I have trasmitted the anticipations of your
abstract to the friend Ghigi who is very interested to all that concerns the
NEWTOM.
A dear regard
Giuliosergio
----- Original Message -----
From: Prof Bianchi <bianchi at DDMC.UNITO.IT>
To: <ORADLIST at listserv.ucla.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 4:21 PM
Subject: R: Re: R:Re: newtom


> Dear Dr. Homolka, I can anticipate some data out from the abstract I sent
to
> 13 th International Congress of DMFR. Congress : E and risks are 2-3.5
times
> lower using NewTom than using spiral CT with a relative low intensity (100
> mA) depending on different hypoteses concerning the remainders. In the
> hypotesis strictly according to ICRP 60 background effective radiation
time
> (BERT) is 18 (maxilla) and 22 (mandibula) days with  spiral CT and 11 days
> (both for maxilla and mandibula) with NewTom.
> In my experience (thousands cases) axial images are of less quality than
> those of high dose- high resolution conventional CT, whereas reformatted
> images can compete with those generate by conventional  CT . Best regards
> Silvio D. Bianchi
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Peter Homolka <xray1 at UBOOT.COM>
> To: <ORADLIST at listserv.ucla.edu>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 1:10 PM
> Subject: Re: R:Re: newtom
>
>
> > Dear Dr. Pasta, Dear Prof. Ghigi,
> >
> > in the attached message you write, if I understood it correctly, that
the
> dose of dental CT is 6 times larger than the dose of a volumetric scan
using
> the Newtom facility.
> > It would be of interest to compare the effective doses of both
modalities.
> Since I do not know the effective dose used by the Newtom instrument, I
> would like to ask whether someone on oradlist could post it in order to
> faciliate comparison with
> > Low-Dose Dental CT.
> >
> > Best regards
> > DI Dr Peter Homolka
> > Department of Biomedical Endineering and Physics
> > University of Vienna
> >
> >
> > -----------------------
> > original message:
> >
> > Dear Oradlisters and Andre Gahleitner,
> > I attach the letter that the Prof.GHIGI,Director of
> > Oral and Maxillo-Facial
> > Radiology of the University of Bologna,has sent me
> > after I asked for one judgment of his on e-mail of the friend
Gahleitner:
> >                  Dear Pasta,
> >                  I concern to the e-mail that you have received from the
> > Austrian colleague I
> >                  answer you that I don't agree.
> >                  Personally in 16 mounths of use with the
> > MAXISCAN-NEWTOM I have been able to
> >                  study not only situations pre-implant and post-implant
> > but also grafts and
> >                  bony distractions,to appraise the relationships among
> > the eighth ones
> >                  inferior included and the mandibolar channels,to
> > appraise cystic
> >                  pathologies,extraneous bodies held,anomalies and
> > included dental elements,to
> >                  give evaluations on the paranasal breasts and on the
> > TMJ;recently I have
> >                  effected a comparative study between the
> > NEWTOM-MAXISCAN and the spiral TC
> >                  GE with dentascan in endowment to the S,ORSOLA HOSPITAL
> > in BOLOGNA.The
> >                  study,object of a thesis of Degree and,I hold,of e next
> > publication,it shows
> >                  an equivalence of results on different patients but
> > with similar pathology
> >                  of dental interest.
> >                  I have verified the absorbed dose in progress of
> > examination spiral TC and
> >                  MAXISCAN-NEWTOM on a limited number of patients,that
> > nevertheless point out
> >                  a relationship 1:6 to favor of the VOLUMETRIC T.C.;the
> > friend Prof.MANNELLA
> >                  of the University of Ferrara has recently introduced a

> > Poster to an
> >                  International Congress just on this comparison.I have
> > asked him the extreme
> >                  of the publication and it will be my hurry to trasmit
> > you them as soon as in
> >                  my possession.
> >                  Do I concern to the TC to low dose(?)of which speaks
> > the Austrian colleague
> >                  I would like to know more something;particularly I
> > would like to know some
> >                  publications on the studies that it reports to have
> > performed for power to
> >                  express a judgment.
> >                  In conclusion,I think that my thought on this matter
> > coincides with the
> >                  your:to the actual state the VOLUMETRIC
> > TC(NEWTOM-MAXISCAN)it represents one
> >                  valid alternative to the traditional and spiral
> > TC,allowing assumptions of
> >                  meaningful diagnostic images in dental and
> > maxillo-facial circle,with
> >                  notable saving of radiant dose and with smaller
> > uneasiness for the
> >                  patient.
> >                  Dear regards
> >                  Gino Ghigi
> >                  Direttore della Radiologia Orale e Maxillo-Facciale
> > dell'Universita' di
> >                  Bologna
> > ___________________________________________________________
> > hol dir deinen nickname - gratis auf http://www.uboot.com
> > uboot - U better be inside
> >
>