Subjective rambling on oral argument for McD v. Chi.

[hamilton02 at aol.com]

Isn't that what the Court did in Cruzan and Glucksberg?

Marci
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Jamar <stevenjamar at gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 21:46:33 
To: <conlawprof at lists.ucla.edu>
Subject: Re: Subjective rambling on oral argument for McD v. Chi.

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Conlawprof at lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/conlawprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.