Prop 8 Question
esegall at gsu.edu
Wed Jan 20 07:50:12 PST 2010
And that satisifes Article III?
>>> David Cruz <dcruz at law.usc.edu> 01/20/10 10:05 AM >>>
The official ballot proponents of Prop 8 were granted standing to
intervene as defendants.
David B. Cruz
Professor of Law
University of Southern California Gould School of Law
Los Angeles, CA 90089-0071
On Jan 20, 2010, at 6:48 AM, "Eric Segall" <esegall at gsu.edu> wrote:
> I am guessing the answer is obvious but can someone tell me how
> there is federal jurisdiction over this case given that the State of
> California is not defending the validity of Prop 8. Could lobbyists
> defend an Act of Congress that the DOJ refused to defend?
> To post, send message to Conlawprof at lists.ucla.edu
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/conlawprof
> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed
> as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that
> are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can
> (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
More information about the Conlawprof