what about judge sotomayor's student note on peurto rico, in harvard 1979 journal
mairi morrison
morrismai at aol.com
Sun May 31 08:59:01 PDT 2009
mairi morrison
new college
On May 31, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Volokh, Eugene wrote:
> Dear Colleagues: For the fourth edition of my
> Academic Legal Writing book, I’d like to include an entire student-
> written article – with comments (in the margins or in between
> paragraphs) on my part – to use as a good example for readers. To
> be optimal, the article should be (1) very well-written, (2) very
> well-reasoned, (3) 40 law review pages or shorter (shorter would be
> better), (4) preferably on a topic that readers would find
> interesting, and (5) written when the author was still a student
> (though it need not have been denominated a student Note or
> Comment). I would also of course ask the author and (if necessary)
> the journal for permission to reprint and comment on the piece, and
> some of my comments will likely be a bit critical. But my goal is
> to find an article that’s so good that the criticisms will be very
> few, and most of the comments will be an explanation of why a
> particular paragraph or argument works well, not of why it doesn’t.
>
> Can any of you recommend such an article? It need
> not have been heavily cited, since here I’m looking for a piece that
> serves as a good model, not necessarily one that has been
> influential. (The ability to have substantial influence is an
> important trait of a good student piece, but by no means the main
> trait, so a piece that got quickly but unforeseeably preempted, or a
> piece in a field in which there’s comparatively little other
> writing, would be just fine despite its low citation count.) Many
> thanks,
>
> Eugene Volokh
> UCLA School of Law
> (with apologies for cross-posting)
> _______________________________________________
> To post, send message to Conlawprof at lists.ucla.edu
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/conlawprof
>
> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed
> as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that
> are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can
> (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/conlawprof/attachments/20090531/1e02791e/attachment.htm>
More information about the Conlawprof
mailing list