Elane Photography v. Willock--reversing the facts

[davidebernstein at aol.com]

I'm curious if those who support the decision in this case would feel 
the same way if a gay photographer was sued for religious 
discrimination for refusing to do the photographs for, say, a Mormon 
wedding, on the grounds that he doesn't want to lend his artistic 
talent to a ceremony sponsored by a church that opposes gay marriage.  
Any takers?