paling around with terrorists; etc. two constitutions
Steven Jamar
stevenjamar at gmail.com
Mon Oct 13 16:56:45 PDT 2008
I think commenting on a candidate's associates is within bounds,
howsoever tenuous the connection or relevance is in terms of what it
really shows about a person's character.
I also think it appropriate to report on those fearful, rabid
supporters at a political rally -- as well as the rabid and often
outrageous anti-rally people who show up.
But I wish that candidates would avoid the Willie Horton and
Swiftboating tactics. I don't think they tell much about the
character of the target and are the sort of things that are
unanswerable effectively.
I think the Ayers thing is of that sort of tactic. It does not seem
to be gaining much traction among undecideds, independents, and young
voters, however. I doubt it will energize that part of the Republican
base sufficiently to bring out enough of those fear voters this time.
And I'm not sure the fear tactics will really work this time.
The U.S. Constitution permits this sort of campaigning and we the
people seem to enjoy it or find it effective enough that it continues
to be done.
I fear for how ugly things will get in the remaining three weeks.
I wish there were a way to have Buddhist "right speech" principle in
our law, or a golden rule in campaigning, or a good faith
requirement. But there is not.
Perhaps a UK sort of defamation standard would be workable -- though
campaigns get plenty rough there too.
The particular version we have today is a bit different from decades
past, but vicious campaigning goes all the way back to earliest times
of our republic, before formalized parties. This Ayers thing is
pretty tame compared to some things we've witnessed.
If anyone could come up with a standard that would be workable and not
so pliable as to introduce yet other layers of unfairness and which
would not be subject to manipulation for political ends, I'd like to
hear it.
Steve
--
Hope is not the conviction that something will turn out well, but the
certainty that something makes sense regardless of how it turns out.
-- Vaclav Havel.
Steven Jamar
stevenjamar at gmail.com
More information about the Conlawprof
mailing list