Scalia & constitutional interpretation

[David Cruz]

Never mind.  I was thinking of City of Boerne v. Flores (1997), in which
Justice Scalia joined all but Part III-A-1 of the majority opinion.

 

David B. Cruz

Professor of Law

University of Southern California Gould School of Law

Los Angeles, CA 90089-0071

U.S.A.

 

________________________________

From: David Cruz 
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 5:11 PM
To: Conlawprof at lists.ucla.edu
Subject: Scalia & constitutional interpretation

 

I have what at the moment is only a vague recollection that in one
constitutional case Justice Scalia refused to join a section about
ratification history of some constitutional clause (perhaps in the
Fourteenth Amendment).  Can anyone point me to such a decision?

 

David B. Cruz

Professor of Law

University of Southern California Gould School of Law

Los Angeles, CA 90089-0071

U.S.A.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/conlawprof/attachments/20080626/d2f5fcad/attachment.htm