[Fwd: Re: Lincoln's Suspension of Habeas Corpus]
guayiya
guayiya at bellsouth.net
Sun Aug 31 15:03:59 PDT 2008
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Lincoln's Suspension of Habeas Corpus
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:46:51 -0400
From: guayiya <guayiya at bellsouth.net>
To: svladeck at wcl.american.edu
CC: Paul Finkelman <PFink at albanylaw.edu>, CONLAWPROF at lists.ucla.edu,
RJLipkin at aol.com, conlawprof-bounces at lists.ucla.edu
References:
<1788567488-1220207452-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-525514975- at bxe175.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
The suspension power belomgs to Congress. Daniel hoffman
Steve Vladeck wrote:
>Well, the longer answer depends on which suspension we're talking about. The one in and around Baltimore that led to Merryman was arguably borne out of military necessity, given the strategic significance of protecting Washington (and the arguable absence of effective civilian government in the area at the time). If one believes that protecting Washington was 'necessary' to protect the Union, then that's perhaps the strongest defense of Lincoln. (Note, though, that General Scott declared Washington "safe" _before_ the suspension occurred).
>
>But the nationwide suspension following the September 24, 1862 proclamation, at least until Congress ratified it via the Habeas Corpus Act of 1863, seems to me on far more dubious footing...
>
>-steve
>
>------Original Message------
>From: Allison Hayward
>Sender: conlawprof-bounces at lists.ucla.edu
>To: Paul Finkelman
>Cc: CONLAWPROF at lists.ucla.edu
>Cc: RJLipkin at aol.com
>Sent: Aug 31, 2008 2:13 PM
>Subject: Re: Lincoln's Suspension of Habeas Corpus
>
>... I think that was an essay question . . .
>
>
>On Aug 31, 2008, at 1:04 PM, Paul Finkelman wrote:
>
>
>
>>yes
>>
>>Paul Finkelman
>>President William McKinley Distinguished Professor of Law
>> and Public Policy
>>Albany Law School
>>80 New Scotland Avenue
>>Albany, New York 12208-3494
>>
>>518-445-3386
>>pfink at albanylaw.edu
>>
>>
>>>>><RJLipkin at aol.com> 08/31/08 10:28 AM >>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>Was Lincoln's suspension of habeas corpus necessary in preserving the
>>Union? Interpret "necessary" in any way you think appropriate. This
>>is a
>>straightforward question--meaning I have no idea what the answer is.
>>
>>Bobby
>>
>>Robert Justin Lipkin
>>Professor of Law
>>Widener University School of Law
>>Delaware
>>
>>Ratio Juris
>>, Contributor: _ http://ratiojuris.blogspot.com/_
>>(http://ratiojuris.blogspot.com/)
>>Essentially Contested America, Editor-In-Chief
>>_http://www.essentiallycontestedamerica.org/_ (http://www.essentiallycontestedamerica.org/
>>)
>>
>>
>>
>>**************It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find
>>your travel
>>deal here.
>>(http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv00050000000047)
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>To post, send message to Conlawprof at lists.ucla.edu
>>To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/conlawprof
>>
>>Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed
>>as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that
>>are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can
>>(rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
>>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>To post, send message to Conlawprof at lists.ucla.edu
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/conlawprof
>
>Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
>
>
>---
>Stephen I. Vladeck
>Associate Professor
>American University Washington College of Law
>4801 Massachusetts Ave., N.W.
>Washington, DC 20016
>(202) 274-4241
>svladeck at wcl.american.edu
>_______________________________________________
>To post, send message to Conlawprof at lists.ucla.edu
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/conlawprof
>
>Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/conlawprof/attachments/20080831/6eae9791/attachment.htm
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: file:///C|/DOCUME%7E1/DANHOF%7E1/LOCALS%7E1/TEMP/nsmail-1.txt
Url: http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/conlawprof/attachments/20080831/6eae9791/attachment.txt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: guayiya.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 143 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/conlawprof/attachments/20080831/6eae9791/attachment.vcf
More information about the Conlawprof
mailing list