Faculty speech after Garcetti

[Edward Still]

Tenure does not depend on the First Amendment; it is a matter of 
contact for private schools and contact and/or due process in public schools.



At 08:03 AM 8/2/2008, Gerber, Scott wrote:
>If this decision stands, isn't tenure dead?  What's the status of 
>this issue at _private_ colleges and universities?
>
>*****************************
>Scott Douglas Gerber
>Professor of Law
>Ohio Northern University
>Ada, OH 45810
>419-772-2219
>http://www.law.onu.edu/faculty_staff/faculty_profiles/scottgerber.html
>http://upress.kent.edu/books/Gerber_S.htm
>
>________________________________
>
>From: conlawprof-bounces at lists.ucla.edu on behalf of Steve Sanders
>Sent: Fri 8/1/2008 3:27 PM
>To: conlawprof at lists.ucla.edu
>Subject: Faculty speech after Garcetti
>
>
>
>For any interest it may hold, I'm passing along a link to an article I
>have in this week's Chronicle of Higher Education about Hong v. Grant,
>a case pending in the 9th Cir that will examine the First Amendment
>speech rights of public university faculty in the wake of Garcetti v.
>Ceballos:
>http://chronicle.com/temp/email2.php?id=YgrrbBf3wvWvdwvwVHgYnSx9npsVC32s.
>(The article should be available through this link at no charge for 5
>days.)
>
>Steve Sanders
>_________________________________
>
>Steve Sanders
>E-mail:  stevesan at umich.edu
>Web: http://www.stevesanders.net <http://www.stevesanders.net/>
>_______________________________________________

Ed Still
http://www.edwardstill.com
http://www.votelaw.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/edwardstill






E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (5.5.1.322)
Database version: 5.10390e
http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor/