impeach Justice Thomas?
Paul Horwitz
phorwitz at hotmail.com
Tue Oct 2 06:13:59 PDT 2007
Well, it's a nice conversation-starter, to be sure. But before taking the
bait, one might want a little clarification. Are you simply saying that
Justice Thomas may have committed what you would view as an impeachable
offense? Or are you saying that he *should* be impeached?
>From: "Malla Pollack" <mpollack at ajsl.us>
>To: <conlawprof at lists.ucla.edu>
>Subject: impeach Justice Thomas?
>Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 07:54:28 -0500
>
>According to the information in Anita Hill's NY Times OP Ed today, Thomas'
>new book includes defamatory material (though she does not use this term).
>I would consider this an impeachable offense. Comments?
>
>
>
>Malla Pollack
>
>Professor, American Justice School of Law
>
>mpollack at ajsl.us
>
>270-744-3300 x 28
>
>articles http://works.bepress.com/malla_pollack/
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>To post, send message to Conlawprof at lists.ucla.edu
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
>http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/conlawprof
>
>Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
>private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
>posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
>wrongly) forward the messages to others.
More information about the Conlawprof
mailing list