Regulation of so-called "astroturf" lobbying stricken from
Senate ethics bill
jfnbl at earthlink.com
jfnbl at earthlink.com
Fri Jan 19 18:02:26 PST 2007
As far as I can tell, the provision (reproduced below) extends to
"grassroots lobbying" the same registration and reporting
requirements that already apply to traditional lobbying that involves
direct contact with members of Congress. There may be some firms
newly captured by the registration requirement because they only
engage in grassroots lobbying, and didn't previously have to register
or report revenues and expenditures in connection with urging the
public to contact their representatives. But I suspect the major
impact is going to be on lobbying firms that are already registered,
and now have to disclose the identity of corporate clients behind
"grassroots" campaigns urging people to contact their
representatives. I'm not sure that's a bad thing. The "grassroots"
campaign for "net neutrality" is a good example. You can look at the
websites for the pro-NN forces, and come away with no notion that the
campaign is orchestrated, organized, and well-funded by corporate
interests.
To answer your question, the regulated conduct probably includes what
Democracy 21 and the League of Women Voters did; but no one is
suggesting that the regulated conduct should be prohibited -- only
that we know who's behind it.
John Noble
At 10:45 AM -0800 19/1/07, Scarberry, Mark wrote:
>Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C73BFA.0A74F43A"
>
>I'm somewhat shocked (as Captain Renault would say, "shocked,
>shocked") that 43 Democratic senators voted to retain in the Senate
>ethics bill a provision regulating communications that urge people
>to contact members of Congress, even outside the context of a
>campaign. Kudos to the ACLU and other groups for opposing this
>proposed invasion of the First Amendment. I wonder whether the
>attempt by proponents of the legislation to create a "grassroots"
>surge of indignation against Republicans for blocking the regulation
>would itself have been subject to the regulation. As the Washington
>Post reports:
>
>"After Republicans temporarily derailed it [the bill] late
>Wednesday, the watchdogs responded furiously. Democracy 21 posted
>what it called a 'Hall of Shame,' listing the 45 Republicans that
>voted to filibuster the bill. The League of Women Voters condemned
>what it called 'late night shenanigans.' "
>
><http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/18/AR2007011802176_2.html>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/18/AR2007011802176_2.html
>
>Is there a principled difference between what Democracy 21 and the
>League did and what they seek to regulate?
>
>Mark S. Scarberry
>Pepperdine University School of Law
>
SEC. 220. DISCLOSURE OF PAID EFFORTS TO STIMULATE GRASSROOTS LOBBYING.
(a) Definitions.--Section 3 of the Act (2 U.S.C. 1602) is amended--
(1) in paragraph (7), by adding at the end of the following:
``Lobbying activities include paid efforts to stimulate grassroots
lobbying, but do not include grassroots lobbying.''; and
(2) by adding at the end of the following:
``(17) GRASSROOTS LOBBYING.--The term `grassroots lobbying' means
the voluntary efforts of members of the general public to communicate
their own views on an issue to Federal officials or to encourage
other members of the general public to do the same.
``(18) PAID EFFORTS TO STIMULATE GRASSROOTS LOBBYING.--
``(A) IN GENERAL.--The term `paid efforts to stimulate grassroots
lobbying' means any paid attempt in support of lobbying contacts on
behalf of a client to influence the general public or segments
thereof to contact 1 or more covered legislative or executive branch
officials (or Congress as a whole) to urge such officials (or
Congress) to take specific action with respect to a matter described
in section 3(8)(A), except that such term does not include any
communications by an entity directed to its members, employees,
officers, or shareholders.
``(B) PAID ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE GENERAL PUBLIC OR SEGMENTS
THEREOF.--The term `paid attempt to influence the general public or
segments thereof' does not include an attempt to influence directed
at less than 500 members of the general public.
``(C) REGISTRANT.--For purposes of this paragraph, a person or
entity is a member of a registrant if the person or entity--
``(i) pays dues or makes a contribution of more than a nominal
amount to the entity;
``(ii) makes a contribution of more than a nominal amount of time
to the entity;
``(iii) is entitled to participate in the governance of the entity;
``(iv) is 1 of a limited number of honorary or life members of
the entity; or
``(v) is an employee, officer, director or member of the entity.
``(19) GRASSROOTS LOBBYING FIRM.--The term `grassroots lobbying
firm' means a person or entity that--
``(A) is retained by 1 or more clients to engage in paid efforts
to stimulate grassroots lobbying on behalf of such clients; and
``(B) receives income of, or spends or agrees to spend, an
aggregate of $25,000 or more for such efforts in any quarterly
period.''.
(b) Registration.--Section 4(a) of the Act (2 U.S.C. 1603(a)) is amended--
(1) in the flush matter at the end of paragraph (3)(A), by adding
at the end the following: ``For purposes of clauses (i) and (ii), the
term `lobbying activities' shall not include paid efforts to
stimulate grassroots lobbying.''; and
(2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following:
``(4) FILING BY GRASSROOTS LOBBYING FIRMS.--Not later than 45
days after a grassroots lobbying firm first is retained by a client
to engage in paid efforts to stimulate grassroots lobbying, such
grassroots lobbying firm shall register with the Secretary of the
Senate and the Clerk of the House of Representatives.''.
(c) Separate Itemization of Paid Efforts to Stimulate Grassroots
Lobbying.--Section 5(b) of the Act (2 U.S.C. 1604(b)) is amended--
(1) in paragraph (3), by--
(A) inserting after ``total amount of all income'' the following:
``(including a separate good faith estimate of the total amount of
income relating specifically to paid efforts to stimulate grassroots
lobbying and, within that amount, a good faith estimate of the total
amount specifically relating to paid advertising)''; and
(B) inserting ``or a grassroots lobbying firm'' after ``lobbying firm'';
(2) in paragraph (4), by inserting after ``total expenses'' the
following: ``(including a good faith estimate of the total amount of
expenses relating specifically to paid efforts to stimulate
grassroots lobbying and, within that total amount, a good faith
estimate of the total amount specifically relating to paid
advertising)''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
``Subparagraphs (B) and (C) of paragraph (2) shall not apply with
respect to reports relating to paid efforts to stimulate grassroots
lobbying activities.''.
(d) Good Faith Estimates and De Minimis Rules for Paid Efforts to
Stimulate Grassroots Lobbying.--
(1) IN GENERAL.--Section 5(c) of the Act (2 U.S.C. 1604(c)) is
amended to read as follows:
``(c) Estimates of Income or Expenses.--For purposes of this
section, the following shall apply:
``(1) Estimates of income or expenses shall be made as follows:
``(A) Estimates of amounts in excess of $10,0000 shall be rounded
to the nearest $20,000.
``(B) In the event income or expenses do not exceed $10,000, the
registrant shall include a statement that income or expenses totaled
less than $10,000 for the reporting period.
``(2) Estimates of income or expenses relating specifically to
paid efforts to stimulate grassroots lobbying shall be made as
follows:
``(A) Estimates of amounts in excess of $25,000 shall be rounded
to the nearest $20,000.
``(B) In the event income or expenses do not exceed $25,000, the
registrant shall include a statement that income or expenses totaled
less than $25,000 for the reporting period.''.
More information about the Conlawprof
mailing list