Criminal harassment laws, speech, and the "no useful purpose"proviso; witch hunts; rationality and criminal law

[Sanford Levinson]

For what it's worth, I subcribe entirely to the views expressed in Michael's message.  One may disapprove of teenage sexuality, but it is ludicrous to view the 15-year-old girl as lacking agency with regard to her encounter with the hapless 16-year-old.  Does anyone have the slightest doubt that had they decided to commit a brutal crime, she would have been charged as an adult?  Like Michael, I'm not sure of the "constitutional" status of these observations.

Sandy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/conlawprof/attachments/20070807/cd99e0f6/attachment.htm