martin-belsky at utulsa.edu
Tue Apr 17 08:56:04 PDT 2007
Does Kansas have an Advisory Opinion provision in its Constitution that
would allow a challenge in State Court [so a decision could come from
the Kansas Supreme Court]?
wasserma at fiu.edu wrote:
> According to the story here: http://www.fac.org/news.aspx?id=18416
> Kansas' governor signed into law regulations on picketing near funerals. But the law includes a provision that it will not take effect until the Kansas Supreme Court or a federal court declares the prohbition valid. According to the story, that provision was added to prevent Fred Phelps and his Westboro Baptist Church from challenging the law successfully and collecting attorneys' fees.
> But how can that judicial determination ever will come about? Kansas cannot enforce the law against any protesters, since the law, by its terms, is not enforceable. And it seems to me that any federal challenge to the law (by Phelps or anyone else) is not ripe, since there is no likelihood that the law could be enforced, and that no one has standing (under Los Angeles v. Lyons). I suppose if Kansas has more forgiving justiciability rules or allows its Supreme Court to render advisory opinions, a pre-enforcement challenge could come that way.
> But it seems to me that the law depends on a judicial determination that cannot come about.
> Am I missing something?
> Howard Wasserman
> FIU College of Law
> To post, send message to Conlawprof at lists.ucla.edu
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/conlawprof
> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
Martin H. Belsky
Professor of Law
University of Tulsa College of Law
3120 E. 4th Place
Tulsa, OK 74104
More information about the Conlawprof