shouldRE: Ther North Carolina (Duke lacrosse) case /Offline Please

Robert Sheridan bobsheridan at earthlink.net
Fri Apr 13 08:52:51 PDT 2007


In this regard, see:

Devereaux v. Perez, Abbey, et. al. (97-35781, July 12, 2000) 00 CDOS  
5716

rs


On Apr 13, 2007, at 6:29 AM, Bezanson, Randall P wrote:

> I know that Prof. Holden's message asked for off line responses,  
> but the topic of the Duke cases raises two questions about which I  
> know little, but would be interested in others' informed views.   
> First, is prosecutorial immunity absolute, and second, if not, what  
> would have to be proven to override it should the boys' families  
> wish to sue to recover their substantial costs of defense over the  
> past year?
>
> Randy Bezanson
> University of Iowa Law School

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/conlawprof/attachments/20070413/03d3354d/attachment.html


More information about the Conlawprof mailing list