Right to travel and airplanes
bobsheridan at earthlink.net
Wed Apr 11 19:05:26 PDT 2007
On Apr 11, 2007, at 4:12 PM, Volokh, Eugene wrote:
> Should our analysis turn in part
> on whether those on the list are U.S. citizens, U.S. resident
> aliens, or
> nonresident aliens? For instance, say that the government concludes
> that some Pakistani resident may well be a terrorist; would it violate
> his constitutional right to travel to bar him from boarding planes
> are flying from, to, or within the U.S.?
Well, the Padilla case emphasized that he was a USC (US Citizen) in
holding that he was entitled to some process called due, which
included the appointment, by the USSC, of counsel.
Non-citizens outside the US are not entitled to DP, as I understand
it, such as when denied a visa by a US consul abroad, altho' I could
be wrong. So, assuming the "some Pakistani resident" abroad seeks to
board a US-flag plane abroad is not a USC, I don't think he has
recourse to US courts, much less a claim of right. Different if the
resident of Pakistan, like Mr. Padilla, was born in the U.S. and thus
a USC by birth, thanks to the 14th Amd.
In case I forgot to mention the name of the Israel, Kamisar, LaFave
casebook earlier, for which apologies, it is "Criminal Procedure and
the Constitution," West Group, 2002 edition.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Conlawprof